(A) Vito Marraro v. State New York (A) Vito Marraro v. State New York

(A) Vito Marraro v. State New York

NY.41073; 189 N.E.2d 606; 12 N.Y.2d 285 (1963)

    • 4,00 kr
    • 4,00 kr

Publisher Description

These four appeals, argued together, are from judgments entered upon orders of the Appellate Division, Third Department, which affirmed, modified or reversed judgments of the Court of Claims in condemnation cases. Each concerns an award to a tenant for fixtures. The appeals involve what fixtures are compensable to tenants, whether the so-called unit rule is to be applied whereby fixtures are evaluated in eminent domain only to the extent that they enhance the value of the freehold, whether claims by tenants in such instances are concluded by clauses in the leases terminating them in event of condemnation and, if not, and if the unit rule is not to be applied, what shall be the measure of damages. Before discussing these questions the cases will be tabulated so as to show, at a glance, what is involved:

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1963
28 February
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
15
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
62.8
KB

More Books by Court of Appeals of New York

People State New York v. Anthony King People State New York v. Anthony King
1984
Fidelity And Deposit Company Maryland v. Arthur Andersen & Co. Fidelity And Deposit Company Maryland v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
1983
Credit Alliance Corporation Et Al. v. Arthur Andersen & Co. Credit Alliance Corporation Et Al. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
1985
Primm v. King Primm v. King
1958
Incorporated Village Nyack v. Daytop Village Incorporated Village Nyack v. Daytop Village
1991
Roberta Rinaldo Et Al. v. Arthur Mcgovern Roberta Rinaldo Et Al. v. Arthur Mcgovern
1991