Fennell v. State Fennell v. State

Fennell v. State

879 A.2d 602, 2005.DE.0000500

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Submitted: May 4, 2005 Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and RIDGELY, Justices ORDER This 19th day of July 2005, upon consideration of the appellant's opening brief and the appellee's motion to affirm pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 25(a), it appears to the Court that: (1) The defendant-appellant, Franklin D. Fennell, filed an appeal from the Superior Court's January 7, 2005 order denying his motion for correction of an illegal sentence pursuant to Superior Court Criminal Rule 35. The plaintiff-appellee, the State of Delaware, has moved to affirm the judgment of the Superior Court on the ground that it is manifest on the face of Fennell's opening brief that the appeal is without merit.1 We agree and AFFIRM.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2005
19 de julio
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
2
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
50.1
KB

Más libros de In the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware

Epstein v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Epstein v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
2001
Gilliard-Belfast v. Wendy's Inc. Gilliard-Belfast v. Wendy's Inc.
2000
Abbott v. Morin Abbott v. Morin
2006
Eley v. State Eley v. State
2005
Ramunno v. Faraone Ramunno v. Faraone
2006
In re Petition of Perkins, No. 419 In re Petition of Perkins, No. 419
2005