United States v. Diprima United States v. Diprima

United States v. Diprima

C01.40137; 472 F.2d 550 (1973)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

ALDRICH, Senior Judge. This is another of the flow of cases objecting to the fruits of a search and seizure where the police acted without a search warrant, but after a request for and a manifestation of consent. We pointed out as recently as Leavitt v. Howard, 1 Cir., 1972, 462 F.2d 992, 998, that to indicate consent, causing the police to forego the obtaining of a warrant, and then to object later, will offer a defendant an untoward advantage. Although the burden of proving consent is on the government, the claim that an apparent consent is not genuine must, for this reason, be carefully scrutinized.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1973
26 de enero
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
3
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
54.1
KB

Más libros de United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Ponta-Garca v. Ashcroft Ponta-Garca v. Ashcroft
2004
In re Colarusso In re Colarusso
2004
Mihaylov v. Ashcroft Mihaylov v. Ashcroft
2004
Anderson v. City of Boston Anderson v. City of Boston
2004
Fit Tech, Inc. v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corporation Fit Tech, Inc. v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corporation
2004
Neuhoff v. Marvin Lumber and Cedar Co. Neuhoff v. Marvin Lumber and Cedar Co.
2004