![Daniel Bruce Mccrea v. State Texas](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Daniel Bruce Mccrea v. State Texas](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Daniel Bruce Mccrea v. State Texas
1973.TX.40916; 494 S.W.2D 821
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. Suffice it to say the States evidence reflects a sale of marihuana by the appellant to an undercover agent on February 18, 1971. Appellants defense was alibi which was rejected by the jurys verdict.