Fox V. Pollack Fox V. Pollack
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Plaintiffs/appellants Earl J. and Barbara L. Fox appeal a summary judgment in favor of defendant/respondent Harry Pollack, attorney at law, in appellants' action for legal malpractice and negligent misrepresentation. We are asked to determine whether an attorney owes a duty of professional care to an unrepresented party to a real estate exchange in which the attorney represents the opposite party. We hold that in the absence of contrary representations by the attorney, no such duty arises. We conclude that the trial court ruled correctly as a matter of law that respondent attorney owed no duty to nonclients in this situation.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1986
May 30
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
12
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
58
KB
Schultz v. County of Contra Costa Schultz v. County of Contra Costa
1984
Scruby V. Vintage Grapevine Scruby V. Vintage Grapevine
1995
California Service Station and Automotive Repair Association v. Union Oil Co. California Service Station and Automotive Repair Association v. Union Oil Co.
1991
Californians for Native Salmon and Steelhead Association v. Department of Forestry Californians for Native Salmon and Steelhead Association v. Department of Forestry
1990
American Olean Tile Co. v. Schultze American Olean Tile Co. v. Schultze
1985
City And County Of San Francisco V. Cartagena City And County Of San Francisco V. Cartagena
1995