In Re $475 In Re $475

In Re $475

96 S.W.3d 625, 2002.TX.0008244

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Appellant, Adam Mahamat, appeals from a default judgment in a forfeiture proceeding. In two points of error, appellant contends that (1) the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to establish that appellee, the State of Texas, properly served appellant with citation in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and (2) the trial court erred in rendering a no-answer default judgment because an answer was on file when the judgment was rendered. We reverse and remand.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2002
December 27
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
5
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
51.8
KB

More Books by Texas Court of Appeals

Coons-Andersen V. Andersen Coons-Andersen V. Andersen
2003
Williams Industries Williams Industries
2003
In Re K.S.M. In Re K.S.M.
2001
Rankin v. State Rankin v. State
1999
Bacey V. State Bacey V. State
1999
Guzman V. Ugly Duckling Car Sales Of Texas Guzman V. Ugly Duckling Car Sales Of Texas
2001