Jack F. Trahan v. Emma J. Trahan Jack F. Trahan v. Emma J. Trahan

Jack F. Trahan v. Emma J. Trahan

1981.TX.41655; 626 S.W.2D 485, 25 TEX. SUP. J. 60

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Emma Trahan instituted this suit against her former husband, Jack Trahan, for partition of his Air Force retirement benefits, which had not been divided by property settlement in either of two previous divorces. The law in Texas has become well established that military retirement benefits earned during marriage are property subject to division upon divorce. See, e. g., Taggart v. Taggart, 552 S.W.2d 422 (Tex.1977); Cearley v. Cearley, 544 S.W.2d 661 (Tex.1976). However, in light of the United States Supreme Courts recent decision in McCarty v. McCarty, 453 U.S. 210, 101 S. Ct. 2728, 69 L. Ed. 2d 589 (1981), we are compelled to review the present status of Texas law. The sole question presented is whether the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, Art. VI, cl. 2, preempts a division by a Texas state court of a spouses entitlement to Air Force retirement benefits pursuant to 10 U.S.C. ?? 8911, 8929.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1981
November 18
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
6
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
58.9
KB

More Books by Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge v. Sam Jackson Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge v. Sam Jackson
1987
Elmer Wayne Henley v. State Texas Elmer Wayne Henley v. State Texas
1978
Kerry Max Cook v. State Texas Kerry Max Cook v. State Texas
1987
Lawrence A. Sanders v. State Tennessee Lawrence A. Sanders v. State Tennessee
1989
Jay Kelly Pinkerton v. State Texas Jay Kelly Pinkerton v. State Texas
1983
J. C. Box v. Don Bates and R. F. Bates J. C. Box v. Don Bates and R. F. Bates
1961