Jackson Jordan Inc. v. Plasser American Corp. Jackson Jordan Inc. v. Plasser American Corp.

Jackson Jordan Inc. v. Plasser American Corp‪.‬

1984.CFC.40157 747 F.2D 1567

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Libbey-Owens Ford Company and Leybold-Heraeus GmbH appeal from denials of their motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (n.o.v.) and for a new trial, and from other rulings related to the issue. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Judge W. Earl Britt presiding, entered judgment in favor of Shatterproof Glass Corporation on jury verdicts that claims 1, 8, 10, and 11 of U.S. Patent No. 3,904,506 (the Apparatus patent) and claims 1, 3, 4, and 8 of U.S. Patent No. 3,925,182 (the Method patent) are valid and are infringed by operation of a Libbey-Owens Ford manufacturing plant located in Clinton, North Carolina. The jury also found that Leybold-Heraeus provision of equipment to that plant constituted inducement to infringe or contributory infringement of the claims. The jury assessed damages in the amount of $2,826,793, and upon motion the court granted Shatterproof $464,000 in prejudgment interest. The court denied Shatterproofs request for injunction and granted Libbey-Owens Ford a compulsory license to permit future practice under the Apparatus and Method patents at a royalty rate of 5%, from which rate appellants appeal.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1984
November 9
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
29
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
82.2
KB

More Books by United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Bott v. Four Star Corp. Bott v. Four Star Corp.
1984
Bott v. Four Star Corp. Bott v. Four Star Corp.
1984
Borsellino v. Goldman Sachs Group Borsellino v. Goldman Sachs Group
2007
Hart v. Fedex Ground Package System Inc. Hart v. Fedex Ground Package System Inc.
2006
Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. United States Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. United States
1988
High Tech Medical Instrumentation, Inc. v. New Image Industries, Inc. High Tech Medical Instrumentation, Inc. v. New Image Industries, Inc.
1995