People v. Marx People v. Marx

People v. Marx

1975.CA.40015 126 CAL. RPTR. 350; 54 CAL. APP. 3D 100

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

This petition for writ of review, prohibition, or mandate asserts that Penal Code section 1192.5 precludes a trial judge from entering into a sentence bargain dispositive of a criminal proceeding unless the prosecuting attorney consents. We conclude that: (1) section 1192.5 does preclude the trial judge from entering into a bargain in the sense of negotiating a more lenient sentence than would be imposed after trial in return for a plea of guilty or nolo contendere; (2) Penal Code section 1192.5 cannot constitutionally be construed to prevent a trial judge from indicating what sentence he will impose if a given set of facts is confirmed, irrespective of whether guilt is adjudicated at trial or admitted by a plea; and (3) the record here is equivocal as to which of those procedures was followed by the trial court. Accordingly, we order that a peremptory writ of mandate issue directing the trial court to clarify its record and proceed as the clarification dictates.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1975
December 29
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
21
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
65.2
KB
Brownell V. Los Angeles Unified School District Brownell V. Los Angeles Unified School District
1992
Flait V. North American Watch Corp. Flait V. North American Watch Corp.
1992
People v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County People v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
1991
Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co.
1981
Crespo V. Superior Court Of Los Angeles County Crespo V. Superior Court Of Los Angeles County
1974
Kazerouni v. Satnick Kazerouni v. Satnick
1991