People V. Stanfield People V. Stanfield
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Defendant Betty Jo Stanfield appeals from her conviction of making terrorist threats. She threatened that if her former attorney did not join her in bringing her "Universe Reform Party" into power, she would hire gang members to kill him. Appellate decisions conflict as to whether a threat containing such conditional language supports a conviction under Penal Code section 422. (Compare People v. Brooks (1994) 26 Cal. App. 4th 142 ["if you testify, I'll kill you" -- sufficient to support a  conviction] with People v. Brown (1993) 20 Cal. App. 4th 1251 ["if you call the police, I'll kill you" -- not sufficient].) Relying on Brown, a decision of Division Seven of this appellate district, defendant contends her conviction must be reversed. In accord with the Fourth District's decision in Brooks, we conclude that Penal Code section 422 may be violated by a threat containing conditional language. We affirm.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1995
February 28
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
18
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
64.7
KB

More Books by Second Appellate District, Division Five Court of Appeal of California

Brownell V. Los Angeles Unified School District Brownell V. Los Angeles Unified School District
1992
Flait V. North American Watch Corp. Flait V. North American Watch Corp.
1992
People v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County People v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
1991
Crespo V. Superior Court Of Los Angeles County Crespo V. Superior Court Of Los Angeles County
1974
Kazerouni v. Satnick Kazerouni v. Satnick
1991
People v. Harris People v. Harris
1991