R. H. Paul v. Commercial Bank Ocala R. H. Paul v. Commercial Bank Ocala

R. H. Paul v. Commercial Bank Ocala

FL.40033; 68 So. 68, 69 Fla. 62 (1915)

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

SHACKLEFORD, J. -- For the second time R. H. Paul brings here for review a judgment recovered against him by the Commercial Bank of Ocala, a corporation. The opinon which we rendered upon the former writ of error will be found in 66 Fla. 83, 63 South. rep. 265. As stated therein, the bank brought an action against ""R. H. Paul, W. J. Hilman, S. A. Rawls, C. M. Sweat, and F. L. Sweat, as late partners, formerly doing business under the name and style of S. A. Rawls & Company"" on a promissory note signed by S. A. Rawls & Co. Service of process was had on R. H Paul alone. W. J. Hillman and S. A. Rawls appeared and pleaded. C. M. Sweat and F. L Sweat were not served and did not appear. The action was dismissed as to Hillman upon the theory that the was not a partner and was not liable.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1915
February 3
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
13
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
60.7
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Florida

Family Law Rules Procedure. Family Law Rules Procedure.
1995
Florida Rules Probate and Guardianship Procedure Florida Rules Probate and Guardianship Procedure
1975
C. C. Morgan v. Bradley L. Eaton C. C. Morgan v. Bradley L. Eaton
1910
Florida Bar v. Amy Sue Klayman Florida Bar v. Amy Sue Klayman
1994
E. Bert Riddle v. State Florida E. Bert Riddle v. State Florida
1948
Florida Bar v. Brian Hal Leslie Florida Bar v. Brian Hal Leslie
1993