State v. Severino State v. Severino

State v. Severino

537 P.2d 1187, 56 Haw. 378, 1975.HI.40032

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Following his arrest, the defendant was taken to the police station where he was advised contemporaneously of his Miranda rights and of the requirements and the sanctions of the implied consent law. He thereafter refused to answer any questions or to take any test to determine the amount of alcohol present in his body, until he had been afforded an opportunity to talk to his lawyer. At no time was he explicitly informed that the Miranda rights had no application to the implied consent proceedings. The defendant was allowed to call his attorney about an hour after he arrived at the station house. But the police, deeming his earlier refusals sufficient for the invocation of the sanctions of the statute, made no further demands upon him to submit to examination.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1975
June 30
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
6
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
50.9
KB
State V. Heirs Of Kapahi State V. Heirs Of Kapahi
1964
Knodle V. Waikiki Gateway Hotel Inc. Knodle V. Waikiki Gateway Hotel Inc.
1987
State V. Tsukiyama State V. Tsukiyama
1974
State v. Watson State v. Watson
2003
Nawahi v. First Trust Co. Nawahi v. First Trust Co.
1931
Manor Vail Condominium Association v. Town of Vail Manor Vail Condominium Association v. Town of Vail
1980