The Cherokee Nation v. the State of Georgia The Cherokee Nation v. the State of Georgia

The Cherokee Nation v. the State of Georgia

30 U.S. 1, 1831.SCT.0000001

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

The complainants allege that the several legislative acts, herein set forth and referred to, are in direct violation of the treaties enumerated in their bill, to which this is a supplement, as well as in direct violation of the constitution of the United States, and the act of congress passed under its authority in the year 1802, entitled, 'an act to regulate trade and intercourse with the Indian tribes, and to preserve peace on the frontiers.' They pray that this supplement may be taken and received as a part of their bill; that the several laws of Georgia herein set forth may be declared by the decree of this court to be null and void, on the ground of the repugnancy to the constitution, laws, and treaties set forth above, and in the bill to which this is a supplement; and that these complainants may have the same relief by injunction and a decree of peace, or otherwise, according to equity and good conscience, against these laws, as against those which are the subject of their bill as first drawn. The case was argued on the part of the complainants by Mr Sergeant and Mr Wirt. No counsel appeared for the state of Georgia.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1831
January 1
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
124
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
119.3
KB
Supreme Court Decisions: Cherokee Nation v. Georgia Supreme Court Decisions: Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
2011
Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States
2014
Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, at January Term, 1832, Delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Marshall in the Case of Samuel A. Worcester, Plaintiff in Error, versus the State of Georgia / With a Statement of the Case, Extracted from the Records of the Supreme Court of the United States Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, at January Term, 1832, Delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Marshall in the Case of Samuel A. Worcester, Plaintiff in Error, versus the State of Georgia / With a Statement of the Case, Extracted from the Records of the Supreme Court of the United States
2018
Chisholm Georgia Chisholm Georgia
2015
View of the Constitution of the United States View of the Constitution of the United States
1999
Sources in American Constitutional History Sources in American Constitutional History
2017
Dred Scott, Plaintiff in Error v. John F. A. Sandford Dred Scott, Plaintiff in Error v. John F. A. Sandford
1856
Bush v. Gore Bush v. Gore
2000
Eastern Band of the Cherokee Indians v. United States and Another Eastern Band of the Cherokee Indians v. United States and Another
1886
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 2023 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 2023
2023
Lawrence V. Texas Lawrence V. Texas
2003
United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
1875