United States v. Bennett United States v. Bennett

United States v. Bennett

139 F.3D 893, 1998.C04.877

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Kimberly B. Bennett seeks review of her jury conviction for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(a) (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). In 1997, Bennett was named in two separate indictments by a federal grand jury. The first indictment alleged that Bennett robbed First Home Federal Savings & Loan Association on August 21, 1992. The second indictment alleged that Bennett robbed First Union National Bank on December 13, 1996. The jury found Bennett not guilty of the 1992 robbery but guilty of the 1996 robbery. On appeal Bennett argues that the district court was required to instruct the jury that the Government had to disprove the defense of coercion or duress beyond a reasonable doubt, rather than instruct the jury that Bennett had the burden of proving the defense of coercion or duress by a preponderance of the evidence. We affirm.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1998
April 14
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
4
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
53
KB

More Books by Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

Cooper v. Calderon Cooper v. Calderon
2002
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc.
1995
Crawford V. Honig Crawford V. Honig
1994
Bay Area Addiction Research and Treatment Inc. v. City of Antioch Bay Area Addiction Research and Treatment Inc. v. City of Antioch
1999
Porsche Cars North America, Inc. v. Allporshe.Com Porsche Cars North America, Inc. v. Allporshe.Com
2000
United States V. Zuno-Arce United States V. Zuno-Arce
1995