Voters' Response to Labeling Genetically Engineered Foods: Oregon's Experience (Bits, Briefs, And Applications)
Journal of Consumer Affairs 2004, Winter, 38, 2
-
- $5.99
-
- $5.99
Publisher Description
Oregonians voted on Measure 27, a measure to label genetically engineered foods, in November 2002. A follow-up survey of 801 voters was conducted to explore how consumers voted in an actual election on this issue, who voted for and against this measure, and why they voted the way they did. The results revealed that the measure did not pass for a variety of reasons. Those included concern with costs, questions about necessity of the labeling in view of safety assessments by the FDA, concern with how the measure was worded, and the impact the measure would have on farmers. The majority of respondents supporting the measure wanted to know what is in the food they are eating. **********
The Relationship Between Sociodemographics and Concern About Food Safety Issues.
2004
Use and Understanding of Nutrition Labels Among Consumers in Lilongwe (Malawi) (Report)
2011
Using Scanner Data for Food Policy Research
2019
Brands, colours, images and the "bio"-sign. Influences of food label's context factors upon consumers' understanding of health claims and their attitudes towards them
2016
Use of Food Labels As a Weight Loss Behavior (Bits, BRIEFS AND Applications) (Report)
2010
Misleading Marketing Communication
2022
Subliminal Advertising and the Perpetual Popularity of Playing to People's Paranoia.
2006
Consumer Financial Literacy and the Impact of Online Banking on the Financial Behavior of Lower-Income Bank Customers.
2008
So You Want to Be an Expert Witness?(Commentary NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS)
2010
Recognizing Consumer Issues in DTC Pharmaceutical Advertising (Direct-To-Consumer)
2008
Aging Gracefully: Emerging Issues for Public Policy and Consumer Welfare (Editorial PRELUDE)
2011
Identity Theft Legislation: The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 and the Road Not Taken (Colloquium on Identity Theft)
2004