What Do Grant Reviewers Really Want, Anyway?(Research)
Journal of Research Administration 2005, April, 36, 1-2
-
- $5.99
-
- $5.99
Publisher Description
Background It can be argued that most research administrators owe their jobs to a key power group in academe: grant reviewers. These folks are the gatekeepers who decide who will get money to fund research, and it is quite a bit of money, as universities now consume about $40 billion in R&D funds annually, much of it obtained competitively from government, industry and private sources (NSF, 2003).
GENRE
Business & Personal Finance
RELEASED
2005
April 1
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
20
Pages
PUBLISHER
Society of Research Administrators, Inc.
SELLER
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
SIZE
261.1
KB
Demystifying the NIH Proposal Review Process (Voe Special Feature) (Victoria J. Molfese of National Institutes of Health) (Interview)
2007
The Rocky Road to Publishing in the Management and Decision Sciences and Beyond
2014
Helpful Gatekeepers: Positive Management of the Limited Submission Process.
2005
A ^AJourney toward Influential Scholarship
2021
Is the Supply Chain Management File Drawer Empty?(Report)
2011
Should 360-degree Feedback Be Only Used For Developmental Purposes?
1997
The Boy in the Striped Pajamas: A Film by Mark Herman (2008) (Movie Review)
2010
Why Academics have a Hard Time Writing Good Grant Proposals.
2007
The America Invents Act--a First for America (Voice of Experience)
2011
Conscious Efforts to End Unconscious Bias: Why Women Leave Academic Research (Report)
2011
The Formation of Scholars: Rethinking Doctoral Education for the Twenty-First Century (2007) the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (Book Review)
2009
Rethinking the "L" Word in Higher Education: The Revolution of Research on Leadership (2006) (Rozana Carducci) (Book Review)
2008