James Rhodes, Complainant and Appellant v. William B. Farmer James Rhodes, Complainant and Appellant v. William B. Farmer

James Rhodes, Complainant and Appellant v. William B. Farmer

58 U.S. 464, 1854.SCT.0000076

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Mr. Phillips made the following points:–– A judgment creditor is entitled in equity to attach a debt due to the debtor. Bayard v. Hoffman, 4 John. C. 453; Egberts v. Pemberton, 7 Ib. 209; Hudson v. Plets, 11 Paige, 182; Candler v. Petit, 1 Ib. 170. Parol evidence was inadmissible to contradict the assignment. It is conceded that the design was to invest the party with a 'legal title.' 1 Story's Eq. §§ 113-115; 6 Ves. 332; 1 Pet. 16; 3 Greenleaf's Ev. 368.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1854
December 1
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
7
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
73.1
KB

More Books by United States Supreme Court

Dred Scott, Plaintiff in Error v. John F. A. Sandford Dred Scott, Plaintiff in Error v. John F. A. Sandford
1856
Bush v. Gore Bush v. Gore
2000
Eastern Band of the Cherokee Indians v. United States and Another Eastern Band of the Cherokee Indians v. United States and Another
1886
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 2023 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 2023
2023
The Cherokee Nation v. the State of Georgia The Cherokee Nation v. the State of Georgia
1831
Lawrence V. Texas Lawrence V. Texas
2003